DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Alden v. Richardson (2017)

Citation
Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Parent Document
Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2017-04-14
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026635/alden-v-richardson/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text

414 chars 
The small claims court rejected Mr. Richardson’s two most substantial claims for
painting and carpet replacement despite evidence in support of them. The court evidently found
credible Ms. Alden’s testimony that the carpet was old when she moved in and that she was not
the cause of its poor condition, and evidently did not find that Mr. Richardson supported his
claim for repainting costs with credible evidence.