Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Mack v. Morel (2025)

Citation
Mack v. Morel (2025)
Parent Document
Mack v. Morel (2025)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2025-02-18

Full Text

527 chars
In addition, the record shows that there was no action by Callahan to indicate an intent on
her part to renew or continue the guarantor term or to create a constructive obligation that might
create equitable estoppel based on any reliance or receipt of benefits in an implied renewal. See In re
Griffin, 2006 VT 75, ¶ 18 (noting that a party intending their conduct to be acted upon by another
who is ignorant of the true facts, where the other acts in reliance on this to their detriment, may give
rise to equitable estoppel).