Mack v. Morel (2025)

Citation: Mack v. Morel (2025)
Parent Document: Mack v. Morel (2025)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2025-02-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10334687/mack-v-morel/ ↗

Full Text

634 chars

As such, the Court cannot find under the allegations in the complaint that there was any
action that would be necessary to demonstrate that Callahan intended or was effectively acting to
renew and continue her guaranty with the new lease. The Court cannot extend or interpret the
actions of either Morel or the Macks to constitute such consent for Callahan as their actions did not
involve or benefit Callahan, or even put her on formal notice in any manner. For these reasons, the
Court finds that there is no constructive, common law, or equitable basis to extend Callahan’s
guaranty beyond the written term of April 30, 2024. ORDER

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text