Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Citation
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Parent Document
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-02-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10334687/mack-v-morel/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
Full Text
609 charsThe legal question on which Defendant Callahan’s motion revolves is whether the continuation of Morel’s tenancy after April 30th effectively continued the written lease agreement and by extension its terms, specifically section 13, which obliges Callahan to act as guarantor for Entry Regarding Motion Page 2 of 5 24-CV-04906 Glenn Mack et al v. June Morel et al Morel’s primary rent obligations. Callahan argues that she is not obliged because the written lease ended on April 30, 2024, and her obligations were never renewed in writing.