Mack v. Morel (2025)

Citation: Mack v. Morel (2025)
Parent Document: Mack v. Morel (2025)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2025-02-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10334687/mack-v-morel/ ↗

Full Text

581 chars

Based on the foregoing analysis, the Court concludes that Defendant Gayle Callahan is
entitled to dismissal under V.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) for the claims for money damages against her based on
the lack of a written lease, agreement, or contract term binding her to make contribution on behalf
of her co-defendant June Morel. 12 V.S.A. § 181(2). The Court finds that the written lease in this
case expired on April 30, 2024. While the terms of the lease continued to be applicable to the Mack
Plaintiffs as landlords and Defendant Morel as tenant, this does not extend under the common law

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text