Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)

Citation
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Parent Document
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1986-06-30

Other Sections in This Document (65)

Full Text

473 chars
The court, however, agrees with the defendant's contention that the plaintiff has misconstrued the lease in her assessment of what is owed. From the terms of the lease, it is obvious that the defendant is not responsible for any portion of the plaintiff’s premiums relating to liability insurance. Further, the plaintiff produced no evidence to show that the “poor housekeeping” condition which caused the increase in 1978 continued to exist after the option was exercised.