Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)

Citation
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Parent Document
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1986-06-30

Other Sections in This Document (65)

Full Text

454 chars
The merits of the case also present a preliminary question. A contested issue is whether the lease makes a default in the tenant’s obligation to reimburse the landlord for increases in insurance premiums, as well as for increases in real estate taxes, the equivalent of a default in rent. The pertinent provisions of the lease are contained in paragraphs 10 and 24. Because of the factual nature of the plaintiff’s claim, paragraph 9 is involved as well.