Section 1808

Citation: Section 1808
Parent Document: McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 777 P.2d 91 (1989)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1989-08-17
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1156663/mchugh-v-santa-monica-rent-cont... ↗

Full Text

1,019 chars

One recent Court of Appeal decision discussed the implications of administrative power to make restitutive money awards. McKee v. Bell-Carter Olive Co. (1986) 186 Cal. App.3d 1230 [231 Cal. Rptr. 304], involved an administrative body that regulates the conduct of its licensees  food "processors"  in relation to the processors' suppliers, food growers.[12] Among other things, the administrative board has authority to entertain a grower's complaint that a processor has failed to pay for products under a contract, and to suspend a processor's license until restitution is paid to the grower.[13] Addressing the grower's assertion that the administrative scheme failed to provide a remedy for recovery of his claimed damages (restitutive, compensatory and punitive), the McKee court stated: "It is certainly true ... that despite this broad statutory framework, the Director has no authority to award damages directly.... [T]his apparently stems from the decision of the California Supreme Court in Jersey Maid. ...

Other Sections in This Document (387)

Full Text