Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Citation: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Parent Document: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2025-12-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10761039/cal-apartment-assn-v-city-of-pasadena/ ↗

Full Text

843 chars

73
      In our view, respondents’ reading of Measure H is strained
and unpersuasive. The requirement to serve a Written Notice to
Cease “before” a three-day notice cannot be read to mean a
requirement to serve it “concurrently” with the three-day notice.
We agree with petitioners that sections 1803(cc) and 1806(a)(1) of
Measure H are reasonably read together to require that a
landlord serve a Written Notice to Cease on a tenant and then
allow the tenant a reasonable period to cure the nonpayment of
rent before a three-day notice may be served or any other action
taken to institute eviction proceedings. This additional cure
period thus extends the three days’ notice required under the
Unlawful Detainer Act.
      Given this conclusion, we turn to whether Measure H’s
notice requirement is preempted using the rubric set forth in the

Other Sections in This Document (114)

Full Text