Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Citation: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Parent Document: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2025-12-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10761039/cal-apartment-assn-v-city-of-pasadena/ ↗

Full Text

962 chars

47
by themselves and their extended families. Measure H states
that, to apply to become a Rental Board member, applicants must
provide a verified statement under penalty of perjury “of the
interests and dealings of the applicant and their Extended
Family in Rental Properties in the county of Los Angeles during
the three (3) years immediately prior to the submission of the
application.” (§ 1811(b); see also § 1803(g) [defining “Extended
Family” as “any spouse, whether by marriage or not, domestic
partner, parent, child, sibling, grandparent, aunt or uncle, niece
or nephew, grandchild, or cousin”].) Petitioners’ argument does
not support their equal protection claim because the disclosure
requirement under section 1811(b) applies equally to “[a]ll
prospective members of the Rental Board.” (See People v.
Nolasco (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 209, 220 [if two groups “ ‘are not
being treated differently, then there can be no equal protection
violation’ ”].) 12

Other Sections in This Document (114)

Full Text