Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Citation
Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Parent Document
Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2025-12-18

Other Sections in This Document (114)

Full Text

670 chars
12     In making this argument, petitioners rely on City of
Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Young (1970) 2 Cal.3d 259, which was not
an equal protection case but rather one based on the right to
privacy. (See id. at pp. 266-268 [grounding right to privacy in the
Fourth Amendment and the “penumbra of constitutional rights”
not specifically mentioned in the federal Constitution].) Because
petitioners did not allege a separate cause of action for violation
of a right to privacy, we need not further consider whether the
disclosure requirement under section 1811(b) infringes on that
constitutional protection. (See Cal. Const., art. I, § 1 [inalienable
right to pursue privacy].)