Section 1942
- Citation
- Section 1942
- Parent Document
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1979-04-25
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2142148/kriz-v-taylor/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (80)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
Full Text
375 charsWe have been unable to find any legislative history which purports to explain this modification made by the Senate. It is, however, apparent that by changing the wording from prohibiting a “demand” for an increase to prohibiting only the actual “increase” itself, the Legislature was specifically rejecting the view that the service of notice was, per se, a prohibited act. 8