Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)

Citation
Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
Parent Document
Kriz v. Taylor, 92 Cal. App. 3d 302 (1979)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1979-04-25

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Full Text

531 chars
Landlord claims that the section does not impose any limitation upon when he may serve a 30-day notice terminating a month-to-month tenancy so long as the actual judgment evicting the tenant and the recovery of possession do not occur within 60 days of an event specified in subdivisions (a)(1) to (a)(4). Thus, Landlord contends that since Tenant was still in possession of the premises 60 days after the prior judgment was rendered against Landlord on the issue of tenantability, subdivision (a)(4) was not violated. We disagree.