Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Citation
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Parent Document
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2007-10-03

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

255 chars
(2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1136 [104 Cal.Rptr.2d 377, 17 P.3d 735] (defendant who brings successful anti-SLAPP motion is entitled to mandatory fees, including a fee enhancement for the contingent risk of the representation); Thibodeaux v. Stonebridge, L.L.C.