Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Citation
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Parent Document
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2007-10-03

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

289 chars
In the present case, the trial court reasonably found the tenants’ various claims were “ 1 “inextricably intertwined” ’ [citation], making it ‘impracticable, if not impossible, to separate the multitude of conjoined activities into compensable or noncompensable time units’ [citation].” 19