Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Citation: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Parent Document: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2007-10-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2300425/cruz-v-ayromloo/ ↗

Full Text

715 chars

Respondents submitted an itemized statement of the services rendered and the corresponding hourly rates of the attorneys of record. 13 Civil Code section 1717, subdivision (a). 14 Civil Code section 1717, subdivision (a). 15 Hasler v. Howard (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1171 [30 Cal.Rptr.3d 714], 16 Wakefield v. Bohlin (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 963, 973 [52 Cal.Rptr.3d 400]. 17 Italics added. 18 Liton Gen. Engineering Contractor, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 577, 588 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 200], 19 Abdallah v. United Savings Bank (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1101, 1111 [51 Cal.Rptr.2d 286]. 20 Los Angeles Municipal Code, section 151.00 et seq. 21 See, e.g., Bd. of Educ. of Frederick County v. I.S.

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text