Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Citation: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Parent Document: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2007-10-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2300425/cruz-v-ayromloo/ ↗

Full Text

853 chars

the tenants prevailed on their claims for forcible detainer, wrongful eviction, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The court found appellant had not legally evicted the tenants. The court further found, because other low-income tenants had in the meantime moved into the building, the tenants could no longer move back into the units. For this reason, the court concluded monetary damages constituted the tenants’ only remedy. The court calculated appellant’s additional profit due to rerenting the units at higher rates to the new tenants at $240,000. Based on appellant’s additional profits because of the wrongful evictions, the court awarded damages in the amount of $29,819 per unit. The court also awarded individual damages, as applicable to each tenant, for lost security deposits, emotional distress, and loss of personal property.

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text