Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)

Citation
Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
Parent Document
Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1994-10-11

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text

485 chars
Schnucks first contends that the trial court erroneously applied or declared the law when it found the parties agreed to a month to month tenancy at $500 per week for the period Bridgeton remained in possession of the premises after the lease expired. It argues the written lease agreement provided for a holdover tenancy at double rent and that this provision could not be orally modified. Schnucks relies on Article 25 of the Lease, which provides as follows: ARTICLE 25 HOLDING OVER