Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Citation
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-10-11
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc., 884 S.W.2d 733 (1994)
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 28
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- Section 408
- § 36
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
- § 90
Full Text
910 charsAfter a non-jury trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Schnucks with a brief opinion in which it found that 1) the nine $500 checks were to be applied to the lease charge for December, 1991; 2) all defendants owed Schnucks $4,500 per month for a total of $10,161.29 for the lease period from January 1, 1992 to March 8, 1992, from which the $4,000 security deposit was deducted for a net amount of $6,161.29; 3) Bridge-ton and Barbieri personally entered into a month to month tenancy with Schnucks at $500 per week for the period from March 9, 1992 through June 30, 1992 and owed Schnucks rent in the total amount of $8,142.86; and 4) defendants were not entitled to a set off for water damage. The court denied Schnucks’ request for attorney’s fees on the grounds it failed to prove the reasonable value of legal services or its entitlement to attorney’s fees. The court did not award interest.