Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Ayers v. Landow, 666 A.2d 51 (1995)

Citation
Ayers v. Landow, 666 A.2d 51 (1995)
Parent Document
Ayers v. Landow, 666 A.2d 51 (1995)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1995-10-02

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text

702 chars
. It is true that the landlord would have clarified his intentions had he provided a date on the notice indicating when the thirty day period began. Nevertheless, the landlord did not file his complaint until well after thirty days from the last posting, and there is no indication that the notice in this case confused the tenant in any way. Although clear dating of a notice would significantly assist some tenants in understanding their legal posture, I am not yet persuaded that § 45-1406 either explicitly or implicitly creates such a requirement. --- 010combined --- 666 A.2d 51 (1995)
Robert W. AYERS, Appellant, v. Stuart LANDOW, Appellee. No. 93-CV-1505.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.