Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)

Citation
Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)
Parent Document
Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1975-05-22

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Full Text

546 chars
ed space then provided in the lobby of the adjoining office building.” If the jury was left with the erroneous impression that Camalier was entitled to retain its location in the hotel lobby, it may the more easily have concluded that Camalier’s renewal notice was made in good faith, particularly since the case as tried to the jury turned heavily on whether Madison had tendered similar space in connection with its relocation demand. 101 . See note 92, supra. 102 . See note 93, supra. 103 . See Gasoline Prods. Co. v. Champlin Ref. Co., supra