Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)

Citation
Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)
Parent Document
Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (1975)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1975-05-22

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Full Text

533 chars
. We see no difference, either in legal contemplation or in the intendment of fl 16, between a notice which, as here, unmistakably advises that a specified course of conduct will be considered a default on or after a date certain in the future, and a notice given after the claimed default has occurred. In each instance the notice serves the function which the notice requirement was designed to provide. 57 . See note 2, supra. 58 . See notes 4, 5, supra. 59 . See note 9, supra. 60 . See note 9, supra. 61 . See note 10, supra. 62