Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Citation
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Parent Document
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-01-05
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490187/riley-v-dempsey/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Full Text
503 charsThe question of whether the damages in this case exceeded “normal wear and tear” was largely a factual determination to be made by the Small Claims Court. It was the province and duty of the Small Claims Judge, as the trier of fact, to weigh the evidence and then apply the appropriate legal standard. Mr. Riley has not shown that the Small Claims Court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous, or that the court applied an erroneous standard. There is no basis for overturning the decision on appeal.