Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Riley v. Dempsey (2005)

Citation
Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Parent Document
Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2005-01-05

Full Text

371 chars
Mr. Riley is correct that it was not necessary for the court to refer to “an apparent
overpayment” or to Mr. Dempsey’s “assorted minor improvements,” but those observations are
based on evidence that was admitted at the hearing, and there is no indication that they resulted
in any error in the decision that was made. They do not provide a ground for reversal on appeal.