Riley v. Dempsey (2005)

Citation: Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Parent Document: Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2005-01-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490187/riley-v-dempsey/ ↗

Full Text

751 chars

For example, the term of the second lease expired on August 31, 2003 (Finding 9). After
the lease expired, Mr. Dempsey remained in the premises and continued to pay monthly rent
(Finding 6), but later there was a “somewhat sudden and premature termination of the lease”
(Finding 19). These findings are not contradictory. After the written lease expired on August
31, 2003, Mr. Dempsey remained in the premises and continued to pay monthly rent; at that
point the implied lease became a month-to-month rental. Nevertheless, Mr. Riley insisted, over
the Dempseys’ objections, that he had to move back into his house; at some point the Dempseys
agreed to be out of the house by October 5, 2003. (Finding 13). There is no contradiction in
these findings.

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text