§ 4461
- Citation
- § 4461
- Parent Document
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-02-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2558043/in-re-soon-kwon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (53)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 5009
- § 5009
- § 5009
Full Text
624 chars¶ 19. Finally, we recognize that there is a clear rationale in this context for requiring specific methods of giving notice and rejecting others. It is likely that the primary concern of the Legislature was the expeditious return of security deposits. It implemented that concern by requiting that the deposit, if any, be returned within fourteen days after the tenant leaves the dwelling unit. The required methods of returning the deposit are likely to cause expeditious receipt; other methods may not. Thus, we have to view prejudice to the tenant as the impact of delay in receiving back all or part of the security *603