§ 4461
- Citation
- § 4461
- Parent Document
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-02-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2558043/in-re-soon-kwon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (53)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 5009
- § 5009
- § 5009
Full Text
754 chars131 Vt. 284, 293, 305 A.2d 571, 577 (1973). In this case, while it is true that on their official request for hearing form tenants did not specifically challenge landlord’s compliance with the security deposit notice requirements, landlord was given fair warning by the Board’s July 22, 2008, notice of hearing that “notices” and “correspondence between the parties” would be considered as part of the security-deposit hearing. The notice of hearing that the Board sent to landlord provided “reasonable” notice to landlord that the inadequacies in the way he provided tenants with security-deposit statements would be considered, and we therefore hold that tenants’ failure to specifically raise the issue of notice did not lead to a waiver of the issue.