§ 4461
- Citation
- § 4461
- Parent Document
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-02-23
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2558043/in-re-soon-kwon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (53)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 4461
- § 5009
- § 5009
- § 5009
Full Text
597 chars¶ 15. We reject the landlord’s argument in this case. The security deposit section of the Landlord and Tenant Act is clearly a consumer protection provision regulating contractual security deposit procedures, and the City of Burlington has added to it additional procedures. The primary obligation of the landlord is to return the deposit, net of any deduction for damage to the premises or for unpaid rent. Accompanying the payment, if any, must be an itemization of any deductions and a notice that the tenant can appeal to the Housing Board of Review. Burlington Code of Ordinances § 18-120(c).