Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)

Citation
In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
Parent Document
In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2011-02-23

Full Text

819 chars
¶ 3. Three tenants, purporting to speak for all, challenged the effectiveness of landlord’s security-deposit statement. These tenants filed a request for hearing form with the Burlington Housing Board of Review (Board) on July 3, 2008 in which they stated that their reason for requesting a hearing was “to dispute security deposit.” On July 22, 2008, the Board sent both landlord and tenants a “Notice of Hearing” form in which it gave notice of the date and time of the hearing and stated that “Each party will be given the opportunity to present the facts . . . and to make legal arguments. The Board will hear testimony and ‘other evidence’ in support of each party’s position. ‘Other evidence’ includes notices, receipts for repairs, written lease, move-in checklist and correspondence between the parties.” * *599