Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/845926.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
Full Text
1,767 charsThere have been several concerning issues that I have been told about by others, but for this email I want to focus on the discussion at QI Conference today regarding the epistaxis patient she managed at the ESC. Today at conference, and also during an after-conference discussion I had with her and Mark Whipple, she demonstrated a significant level of poor medical decision making and most concerning a complete lack of responsibility and ability to ask for help when needed. She placed blame on the system, specifically referencing the lack of her having a nurse to help and not having proper supplies to manage the epistaxis. At no point, even after I asked her what she would do differently in the future, did she offer any alternative plan. When I suggested to her that she could have admitted the patient, consulted Hematology, and then taken the patient to the OR later that day she stared at me and said, “I guess I could have called our doc-of-the-day”. I replied that she should be able to manage this patient, and if needed, should keep in mind that cancelling clinic and taking a patient to the OR is always an option. It further concerns me that she did not ask for help with this case and only presented this case at [QI] Conference because I emailed her requesting that she do so. Her poor decision making at the beginning is very concerning, specifically deciding to pull the nasal packs in a coagulopathic patient when she (in her opinion) did not have the proper equipment to manage that encounter. Finally, her decision to put this patient in an ambulance and send them to a local non-UW ED to let the community ED providers and community OTO provider on call manage this patient further shows a lack of expertise and poor medical decision making.