Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/845926.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 845926.pdf
Full Text
1,748 chars2 Referring to Dr. Kris Moe, the Department chief at HMC at the time. -4- For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 84592-6-I/5 a presentation at our fall faculty meeting . . . and talked about the different elements of what we were concerned about. .... I asked to present in the morning, but it was pushed to late in the day. I wanted Mark Whipple to present the work because I knew it would be “safe” coming from his mouth rather than mine. He was out of town that day. I did not feel safe at the time, and when discussed further with Dr. Futran during the November 14, 2018 meeting, his response made it clear that I had offended him and others. That same month, in front of faculty, Dr. Litvack told the head of the academic promotions committee that the promotion criteria was opaque and created opportunities for bias and discrimination thus disadvantaging female physicians and other underrepresented groups in the profession. In October 2018, ESC Manager Rekha Matken e-mailed the ESC supervisor, Kevin Kiemele, and Dr. Eugene Yang, the ESC medical director, about Dr. Litvack: I think that things between her and the [medical assistants] are improving . . . she wants to see sinus patients, which is part of general ENT but sounds like the way it was presented to [the patient service specialist] is that it should be a number one priority . . . [Dr. Litvack] should get all the sinus patients first and then others. Kiemele responded that while Dr. Litvack had input, “for her, it is first come first served from that list . . . while [Dr. Ian Humphrey]’s practice is intentionally focused on rhinology and sinus surgery, [Dr. Litvack]’s is focused on general ENT problems.” Dr. Yang