Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Citation
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-03-14
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Full Text
442 charsThe Bowleses claimed that Kruth and her husband created a disturbance when they came to the premises to collect the February rent. Because of this, the defendant informed the plaintiff that all future communications should be in writing. At that time, the defendant had not made the real estate tax payment pursuant to the sublease, as it questioned the calculation of the amount. By May or June, 1996, the defendant was current on the taxes.