Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Citation
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-03-14
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Full Text
542 charsThe plaintiffs argument is essentially that at the time it brought suit, it was necessary to employ an attorney to prompt the defendant to make timely payments under the sublease. Our careful review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the court, on the basis of its findings, made an informed and logical decision on the issue of attorney’s fees under the sublease and, in reaching its decision, did not exceed its discretion. Because we find no abuse of the court’s discretion, the plaintiffs claim must fail. B The Equipment Lease