Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)

Citation
Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Parent Document
Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2000-03-14

Other Sections in This Document (30)

Full Text

709 chars
The defendant stored the oven and other items of equipment off the premises. Near the end of the term of the leases, the defendant’s attorney wrote to the plaintiffs attorney, indicating that the defendant wanted to exercise its option to purchase equipment. Despite the defendant’s interest, Kruth appeared on the premises on January 3,1997, demanding the immediate return of all of the equipment. Subsequent negotiations were fruitless. The parties could not consummate a deal or decide on a method of return of the equipment; the *862defendant wanted Krath to retrieve the items at the premises, and Krath wanted them delivered to her. Krath eventually retrieved the equipment and sold it to a third party.