Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)

Citation
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Parent Document
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2009-09-15

Other Sections in This Document (28)

Full Text

882 chars
78 Conn. App. 691, 694, 828 A.2d 620 (2003), rev’d on other grounds, 272 Conn. 722, 865 A.2d 1129 (2005). “When construing a lease, we bear in mind three fundamental principles: (1) The intention of the parties is controlling and must be gathered from the language of the lease in the light of the circumstances surrounding the parties at the execution of the instrument; (2) the language must be given its ordinary meaning unless a technical or special meaning is clearly intended; (3) the lease must be construed as a whole and in such a manner as to give effect to every provision, if reasonably possible. . . . Where contract language is clear and unambiguous, the question of contractual intent presents a question of law for the court . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co., LLC, 91 Conn. App. 179, 189, 880 A.2d 945 (2005).