Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)

Citation
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Parent Document
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2009-09-15

Other Sections in This Document (28)

Full Text

507 chars
notice. They further alleged that the defendant’s principals used the defendant to “[engage] in a scheme . . . to enhance the value of the [property by securing long term leases and large security deposits from tenants, including but not limited to Milford Paintball, under false pretenses that [the defendant] was willing, ready and able to perform [b]uilding renovations for tenants,” in violation of CUTPA. The plaintiffs further sought restitution of a $32,083.52 security deposit paid to the defendant.