Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)

Citation
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Parent Document
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2009-09-15

Other Sections in This Document (28)

Full Text

752 chars
The defendant subsequently filed an answer, special defenses and a counterclaim. The defendant asserted two special defenses. First, it averred that if and to the extent that it did not complete performance of the landlord’s work, it nevertheless was not in breach of the lease because Milford Paintball failed to provide it with written notice and an opportunity to cure, as required under the terms of the lease. Second, the defendant contended that it was discharged from its remaining duties under the lease because Milford Paintball anticipatorily breached the lease. In its counterclaim, the defendant asserted that Milford Paintball anticipatorily breached its obligations under the lease, thereby causing the defendant to sustain money damages.