Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)

Citation
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Parent Document
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Associates, LLC, 978 A.2d 118 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2009-09-15

Other Sections in This Document (28)

Full Text

555 chars
On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly interpreted the lease by concluding that, under § 1.10 of the lease, the provisions of the lease agreement did not come into effect until the defendant had substantially completed the landlord’s work. The defendant argues that the court improperly concluded that the provisions of the lease providing for written notice of default and an opportunity to cure any failure to substantially complete the landlord’s work under § 14.07 did not apply because the lease agreement had not become effective.