Section 47a-15
- Citation
- Section 47a-15
- Parent Document
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-11-02
Other Sections in This Document (64)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
Full Text
694 charsInsofar as the defendant argues that the simultaneous delivery of the pretermination notice and notice to quit rendered defective the notice to quit served on Zena Mae Johnson, he does not have standing to assert such a claim. “The issue of standing implicates the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. . . . Standing focuses on the party seeking to be heard and not on the issues that party wants to have heard. . . . The question of standing does not involve an inquiry into the merits of the case. ... It merely requires allegations of a colorable claim of injury to an interest that is arguably protected by [a] statute or common law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McGinty v. McGinty,