Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)

Citation
St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
Parent Document
St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2010-11-02

Other Sections in This Document (64)

Full Text

690 chars
appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, St. Paul’s Flax Hill Co-operative, in its summary process action alleging, among other things, that the defendant had no legal right or privilege to occupy the premises at issue. The defendant claims that the trial court should have dismissed the summary process action (1) on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in that the plaintiff simultaneously served a pretermination notice and notice to quit, and (2) on the ground that the plaintiff failed to return the complaint within three days of the return day pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-23a. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.