Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)

Citation
St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
Parent Document
St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2010-11-02

Other Sections in This Document (64)

Full Text

631 chars
The issue in the present appeal is whether the defendant, an adult person whose occupancy was not approved by the plaintiff when such approval was required and who was not a party to the written lease and occupancy agreement, is entitled to a pretermination notice pursuant to § 47a-15. This issue “raises a question of statutory construction, which is a [question] of law, over which we exercise plenary review. . . . The process of statutory interpretation involves the determination of the meaning of the statutory language as applied to the facts of the case, including the question of whether the language does so apply. . . .