Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)

Citation
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Parent Document
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1983-12-06

Other Sections in This Document (67)

Full Text

751 chars
would, “where appropriate,” have had the right to request an injunction “as provided in chapter 916,” which is simply the part of the general statutes stating the general rules on injunctions. Thus, except for the provisions involving privileged trial status and award of attorney's fees, General Statutes § 42-133g does no more than reaffirm remedies any franchisee would have had by virtue of General Statutes §§ 42-133e and 42-1331 Furthermore, the plaintiff's argument would interpolate the sixty day period for notice of termination, contained in General Statutes § 42-133Í, into General Statutes § 42-133g as a statute of limitations attached to the franchisee's right to seek an injunction. We see no justification for such an interpolation. II