Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)

Citation
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Parent Document
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1983-12-06

Other Sections in This Document (67)

Full Text

632 chars
The court noted that in the defendant’s action for an injunction and for money damages, the pleadings were closed but discovery was not completed; in the plaintiff’s action for an injunction and possession the pleadings were not closed. Turning to the summary process action, before us on appeal, the court ruled orally from the bench that the plaintiff must prove good cause for termination of the franchise in order to prove termination of the lease. It also granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the questions involved were too complex for summary process. The basis for this determination was an amal *443