Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)

Citation
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Parent Document
Southland Corp. v. Vernon, 473 A.2d 318 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1983-12-06

Other Sections in This Document (67)

Full Text

640 chars
solely in the defendant’s action against the plaintiff under General Statutes § 42-133g and that, once the defendant failed in his attempt to secure a temporary injunction in that action and once the sixty days for termination had expired, the issues in this case became factually simple: whether the plaintiff had in fact given notice of the termination of the franchise, thus terminating the lease, and whether the sixty day period had expired. Underlying this argument is the premise that General Statutes § 42-133g provides the sole remedy to a franchisee in a dispute with its franchisor over termination of the franchise. We disagree.