Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Housing Authority v. Cyr, 234 Conn. App. 527 (2025)

Citation
Housing Authority v. Cyr, 234 Conn. App. 527 (2025)
Parent Document
Housing Authority v. Cyr, 234 Conn. App. 527 (2025)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2025-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Full Text

776 chars
The trial court improperly determined that the Kapa notice sent to the
         defendant was invalid because it failed to refer to specific provisions of the
         lease or the statutory sections that had been violated as a result of the
         conduct alleged in the notice, as such specificity was not required pursuant
         to § 47a-15 or our case law and the notice identified eight specific instances
         of conduct by the defendant that constituted violations of the lease, the
         plaintiff’s rules and regulations, and his obligations as a tenant pursuant to
         statute (§ 47a-11), and amounted to a nuisance, which was sufficient to
         inform the defendant and protect against premature, discriminatory, or
         arbitrary eviction.