Showing 61–80 of 259 results
interpretation. He argues that the Tenants are not entitled to relocation assistance because the City never issued a "notice of condemnation, eviction or displacement order." Br. of Appellant at 17. The Tenants argue thatan order is not required because
restitution to Klee “based on the court’s finding that the Plaintiff named in the eviction order has provided a 90 Day Notice to Vacate and Written Notice to Sell property.” Id. at 32 (emphasis omitted). The writ was issued
intended by Congress. Similarly, such an interpretation cannot plausibly be extended to a permanent 30-day notice requirement for all covered dwelling evictions from subsection (c)(1). Indeed, it is difficult to imagine Congress requiring a landlord—or neighboring tenants
Amicus suggests a much broader interpretation of Section 4024, offering that, because Congress did not specify an eviction basis in the notice to vacate protections set forth in subsection (c), Congress purportedly intended that those protections be interpreted as applying
legal deficiency in the unlawful detainer action that would have caused confusion to Ms. Parker. But an eviction premised on a misleading notice to 3 It is worth noting that an OLD provides only a narrow form of relief
prepaid deposit and prepaid rent to displaced tenants within seven days of the governmental agency sending notice of the condemnation, eviction, or displacement order to the landlord. The landlord shall pay relocation assistance and any prepaid deposit and prepaid rent
agency set:J.ding notice of the condemnation, eviction, or displacement order to the landlord. The landlord shall pay relocation assistance and any prepaid deposit and prepaid rent either by making individual payments by certified check to displaced tenants
obligations herein mentioned, the Lessor or his attorneys shall give the Lessee proper written notices, commence with lawful eviction, and have all persons and property removed therefrom as provided in the Landlord-Tenant Act (RCW 59.18). 5 For the current
P.3d 4 (2002). Pham bases his argument on RCW 59.18.085(3)(c)'s reference to a "notice of the condemnation, eviction, or displacement order."6 Amicus King County Bar Association (KCBA) argues that the obligation to pay relocation assistance under
play. At that point the landlord must pay the required relocation assistance within seven days of receiving notice of the condemnation, eviction, or displacement order. If a landlord does not pay within that period, the governing agency may advance payment
Fisons, 122 Wn.2d 299, 326, 858 P.2d 1054 (1993)). Here, however, in enacting our state’s notice requirements for residential evictions, our legislature wisely envisioned circumstances in which federal statutes would provide tenants with additional protections. Thus, the RLTA itself
that (1) federal law did not prevent Housing Kitsap from bringing its unlawful detainer action without additional notice, (2) Kimbra’s eviction did not violate her due process and equal protection rights, and (3) Kimbra failed to challenge the timeliness
rental housing. Thus, the plain meaning of the CARES Act is that it requires 30 days’ notice to vacate only for evictions stemming from nonpayment of rent. Accordingly, the superior court commissioner erred by denying the Housing Authority’s petition
defense or set-off. RCW 59.18.380. 1. K&H’s proof of grounds for eviction Pursuant to the December 27 notice, K&H alleged at the show cause hearing that Ms. Daniels was subject to eviction under
backyard cottage to Dan Hanley when the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic began. She sought to evict Hanley and gave him 60 days’ notice of her intention to move into the unit herself. Due to this unprecedented pandemic, Governor
defined in the ordinance. Here, the landlord, relying on the "elects to sell" provision, gave the tenant notice of just cause for eviction after she had already sold the home. The issue is whether the landlord may properly invoke
report. Furthermore, the CRS report does not express the proposition that the CARES Act requires 30 days’ notice for all covered dwelling evictions. Indeed, it does not state or present argument or analysis that such is the correct—and only
number of tenant rights. Br. of Appellants at 21-30 (citing, for example, right to “just cause” evictions, right to 14-day notice for failure to pay rent, right to unilaterally reinstate tenancy after failure to rent, right to request
landlord must comply with the [statutory] requirements” to utilize the unlawful detainer process). After serving notice, the next stage of the eviction process is the filing of a complaint and summons. RCW 59.18.365; RCW 59.12.060, .080. To evict a tenant
answer the summons under CR 4(d)(4) and that Hall's service of the mailed eviction summons did not give the notice required by CR 6(e).27 While the civil rules govern unlawful detainer of giving notice according