Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Showing 1–20 of 35 results

14 DCMR § 308

14 DCMR § 308 DC municipal

...Within 45 days after the termination of the rental agreement and the return of possession, the owner shall: (a) Return the security deposit and any accrued interest to the tenant; or (b) Provide the tenant with an itemized statement of...

14 DCMR § 308

14 DCMR § 308 DC municipal

...An owner who fails to return the security deposit and interest within the period prescribed in § 308.8, without the tenant's consent, shall be liable to the tenant for: (a) The amount of the security deposit; (b) Accrued interest...

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021) DC municipal

who fails to return a security deposit “shall be liable . . . for treble” the deposit’s

Section 16

Hto7, LLC v. Elevate, LLC (2024) DC municipal

had not returned the $38,000 security deposit refund despite receiving more than

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021) DC municipal

frivolous or unfounded refusal to return a security deposit . . . motivated by a

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021) DC municipal

against Mr. Pourbabai: In addition to a return of their $5,000 security deposit, they

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021) DC municipal

$5,000 security deposit at move-in, and Mr. Pourbabai in turn agreed to return that

Section 16

Hto7, LLC v. Elevate, LLC (2024) DC municipal

when it failed to return the $38,000 portion of its security deposit that was due to be

Section 16

Hto7, LLC v. Elevate, LLC (2024) DC municipal

lease entirely, and then seek the return of its security deposit in a suit for damages, as it did.

Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007)

Oliver v. Mustafa, 929 A.2d 873 (2007) DC municipal

...Upon his return, Ms. Oliver refused to allow him access to his room or his property, and again refused to return his $400 security deposit. Without the security deposit, Mr. Mustafa lacked the funds to obtain other housing, and was...

Section 16

Hto7, LLC v. Elevate, LLC (2024) DC municipal

refund. Elevate asserted that Hto7’s failure was a material breach and demanded the return of its entire security deposit.

Section 16

Hto7, LLC v. Elevate, LLC (2024) DC municipal

for the trial court to consider whether Hto7’s failure to return the $38,000 security deposit was a material breach.

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021) DC municipal

return, including interest.” Id. § 309.3. His failure to rebut that evidence is sufficient grounds to affirm the tenant’s security-deposit claim.

Section 2

Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. Partnership, 667 A.2d 578 (1995) DC municipal

...Tenant also maintains that it is entitled to return of the security deposit and to interest thereon.