Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/893900.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 893900.pdf
Full Text
856 charsthe court determines the defendant is unlikely to appear, it can turn to the options listed in CrR 3.2(b) and "impose the least restrictive of [those] conditions [or a combination thereof] that will reasonably assure that the accused will be present for later hearings." CrR 3.2(b). If the court determines that the accused is likely to present a danger to others or tamper with witnesses, it may impose any of the (nonexclusive) conditions listed in CrR 3 .2(d). Here, the trial court explained that it was conditioning bail under CrR 3.2(b), which applies where there is a showing of a likely failure to appear. CrR 3.2(b) sets -16- Statev. Barton (Peter Richard), 89390-0 forth the following conditions of release in the event of a showing of a likely failure to appear: