DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020)

Citation
Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020)
Parent Document
Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2020-09-10
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4784084/aljabban-v-fontana-indoor-swap-... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (85)

Full Text

569 chars 
and tenants. Civil Code section 1019 applies only in the absence of a specific
agreement about fixtures between the landlord and tenant. (R. Barcroft &
Sons Co. v. Cullen (1933) 217 Cal. 708, 712; Renner v. Huntington-Hawthorne
Oil & Gas Co. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 93, 103.) Here, in paragraph 4, the parties
did enter into a specific agreement that supersedes whatever right to remove
trade fixtures Aljabban may have had under Civil Code section 1019.
Accordingly, we focus on the terms of the agreement, which refers to “booth
construction” becoming a “permanent fixture.”