Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)

Citation: Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)
Parent Document: Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los Angeles (2026)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2026-05-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10859038/apartment-assn-of-los-angeles-... ↗

Full Text

929 chars

10
housing projects and allows for ‘more stringent local regulation’ of
housing projects, but local housing density caps are being used to
‘frustrate the statute’s purpose’ ”].)
       When “[r]uling on a facial challenge to a local
ordinance, the court considers the text of the measure itself,
not its application to any particular circumstances or individual.”
(T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of San Francisco (2019)
6 Cal.5th 1107, 1117; accord, Pasadena, supra, 117 Cal.App.5th
at p. 233; San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City and County of
San Francisco (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 463, 487.) In assessing a
facial challenge, “ ‘[t]he proper focus of constitutional inquiry is
the group for whom the law is a restriction, not the group for
whom the law is irrelevant.’ ” (American Academy of Pediatrics v.
Lungren (1997) 16 Cal.4th 307, 345; accord, Tom v. City and
County of San Francisco (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 674, 680.)

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text